MPs call for delay to implementation of ‘over-ambitious’ digital tax plans
The government’s timeline for implementing plans to digitise record keeping and reporting of tax is “wholly unrealistic” and should be delayed until at least 2019-20, the House of Commons Treasury Committee has said.
Treasury Committee chair Andrew Tyrie said poor implementation of digital tax plan could end in 'disaster' - Photo credit: PA Images
In its report on the Making Tax Digital reforms, which will see businesses being required to keep digital records and produce quarterly updates for HMRC, the MPs said they were “very concerned” about the burden this would place on businesses.
The plan came under fire when it was first announced in 2015 for putting undue pressure on businesses, and HMRC granted an exemption for small business and the self-employed in August last year.
However, the Treasury committee said that even with this exemption, there are still likely to be a minimum of 2.5 million business affected, possibly even twice that figure.
Andrew Tyrie, chairman of the committee, said that carefully introduced digital reforms could greatly improve the administration of the tax system, but that without sufficient care it “could be a disaster”.
The criticisms centred on the planned timeline for implementation. HMRC has proposed a phased implementation, with income tax reporting due to go live first in either April 2018 or April 2019, depending on the size of the business.
The committee described this April 2018 start date as “wholly unrealistic”, adding that just over a year was “too short a lead time for such a fundamental change” to the tax administration system, and urged a much wider consultation and debate.
“It is extremely unlikely that the vast majority of businesses will be capable of adapting to that start date at reasonable cost. Nor should they be expected to do so,” the committee said.
“The committee therefore recommends a delay of the full implementation of [Making Tax Digital] until at least 2019-20.”
However, it added that it “also looks unlikely” that a 2019 start date would be possible – although it noted that this would depend on the exact shape of new proposals due to be published by government this month, following a consultation over the summer.
“A large proportion of the UK’s businesses, particularly the millions of small businesses, are not currently well equipped to move over to digital record keeping and reporting. Nor may they be so for several years,” the committee said.
The government has promised businesses free-to-use software to help make the shift, but the committee stressed that businesses would also need help choosing the right software to use.
It added that – no matter how difficult it is in software terms – HMRC should ensure that tools are available to convert information held in spreadsheets to information that can be submitted in the quarterly digital update.
The MPs also raised concerns that, based on available evidence, the changes might not save the government as much money – the consultation document launched in the summer put a price tag of £625m on it – as it hoped.
“Evidence given to the committee suggests that under the current timetable, the total cost to business (including software, hardware, training, agent fees and, above all, time) might exceed the total benefits in improved tax yield,” the committee said.
“In other words, even if the yield were to rise, the return to the whole economy could be negative. The government’s estimate of the yield may therefore neglect the effect of overall behavioural changes.”
The report recommended that HMRC carries out a more comprehensive set of end-to-end pilots, which take in an entire reporting cycle, than it has planned to make sure the costs to businesses are fully understood before it is made mandatory across the board.
It said that although HMRC’s agile approach, which will see software altered during the course of the pilot, should provide some useful information, the fact they were carried out by invitation of HMRC might exclude the opinions of the most vulnerable businesses.
Elsewhere in the report, the MPs described the £10,000 threshold for requiring digital reporting and record-keeping as “palpably absurd” as some companies with a turnover that low would have no taxable profits.
“It is one thing for HMRC to impose digital record keeping on taxpayers. For them to impose it on non-taxpayers would be quite another - it would be seen to be as unreasonable as it is disproportionate,” it said.
The Chartered Institute of Taxation welcomed the report, with president Bill Dodwell saying that it was right to call for more comprehensive pilots and a delay in the project’s implementation.
“Rushing it through to deliver by April 2018 is just too short a timescale. There are hundreds of different providers of accounting software – in many cases adapted for specific industries and trades. Right now we have no idea how many of these will be ready and tested in time,” he said.
A fresh look at data protection and backup best practice, particularly when it comes to ransomware.
Council reveals more details of new ICT model, including SIAM and strengthened governance arrangements
"At the end of the day, the services are all the same, so if you’re doing bins from Shetland to Glasgow to the Borders, we all do similar services"
Des Ward, information governance director at Innopsis, reflects on the real story behind the WannaCry cyber-attack.
BT looks at turning points within the UK defence sector, the evolving nature of warfare and how new cyber-attacks pose new questions for our national defence
BT's Phil Brunkard on technological innovation and how it's affecting the public sector
BT's Phil Brunkard on brain implants, parking spaces, and takeaways from BT Innovation Week
BT finds that IT Directors disagree over whether Artificial Intelligence will create or displace jobs