Zuckerberg snubs MPs again

Written by Sam Trendall on 16 May 2018 in News
News

DCMS committee continues to pursue Facebook CEO as chair says ‘we expected detail – we got excuses’

Credit: Andrej Sokolow/DPA/PA Images

Mark Zuckerberg has, once again, defied a request to appear before a parliamentary select committee.

Earlier this month, the House of Commons Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Committee wrote to Facebook for the second time requesting that the company’s chief executive give evidence before MPs. Zuckerberg was warned that, if he did not voluntarily attend a committee hearing, he was liable to face a formal summons to do so the next time he is in the UK. The missive also contained details of 39 questions the committee believed had not been satisfactorily answered by the appearance in April of Facebook’s chief technology officer, Mike Schroepfer.

The social network’s UK head of public policy Rebecca Stimson has now responded to the committee and provided written answers to the 39 questions. But she added that her company's boss (pictured above) will not be appearing before the committee in the foreseeable future.


Related content


Stimson said: “While Mr Zuckerberg has no plans to meet with the committee or travel to the UK at the present time, we continue to fully recognise the seriousness of these issues, and remain committed to working with you to provide any additional relevant information you require for your inquiry into fake news. We will also continue to cooperate fully with the relevant regulators.”

DCMS Committee chair Damian Collins expressed his dissatisfaction at Facebook’s response. But he added that, if Zuckerberg will not be in the UK at any time during the course of the inquiry, then the committee “would also be open to taking his evidence by video link”.

Collins said: "It is disappointing that a company with the resources of Facebook chooses not to provide a sufficient level of detail and transparency on various points, including on Cambridge Analytica, dark ads, Facebook Connect, the amount spent by Russia on UK ads on the platform, data collection across the web, budgets for investigations, and [its response] shows general discrepancies between Schroepfer and Zuckerberg’s respective testimonies. Given that these were follow-up questions to questions Mr Schroepfer previously failed to answer, we expected both detail and data and, in a number of cases, got excuses.”

He added: “If Mark Zuckerberg truly recognises the ‘seriousness’ of these issues as they say they do, we would expect that he would want to appear in front of the Committee and answer questions that are of concern not only to paliament, but Facebook’s tens of millions of users in this country. For too long, these companies have gone unchallenged in their business practices, and only under public pressure from this committee and others have they begun to fully cooperate with our requests. We plan to write to Facebook in the coming days with further follow-up questions."

 

About the author

Sam Trendall is editor of PublicTechnology

Share this page

Tags

Categories

CONTRIBUTIONS FROM READERS

Please login to post a comment or register for a free account.

Related Articles

Interview: Surveillance Camera Commissioner discusses his mission to protect privacy and human rights
10 April 2018

As an ever-greater volume of increasingly sophisticated devices watch us all, PublicTechnology talks to regulator Tony Porter about his office’s role in ensuring surveillance is always...

The core mission of GDS is to help government work better for everyone
3 May 2018

Ahead of next week’s Sprint 18 event, GDS director general Kevin Cunnington outlines the organisation’s focus areas for the coming months, and its achievements of the past two years

High court gives government six months to amend data-retention law
27 April 2018

Both the government and human rights group Liberty claim victory after judges agree that the so-called snoopers' charter is incompatible with EU legislation 

MPs raise ‘serious concerns’ about NHS Digital's use of patient data
16 April 2018

Select committee repeats request to stop sharing with the Home Office the name and address of suspected immigration offenders, but NHS Digital insists arrangement is ‘in the public interest’