Social media: Duty of care expected to include ‘human moderation’ of harmful content
Minister says that regulator is likely to require firms to use both manual and automated checks
New regulations requiring social networks to protect users from harmful content will necessitate human moderation, as well as automated checks, a minister has indicated.
Online safety laws proposed by the government would require social media firms to ensure harmful content is identified and removed quickly. The failure to do so could result in fines potentially stretching to billions of pounds, to be imposed by Ofcom, which will assume the role of the UK’s online harms regulator.
As part of which, the communications watchdog is to recommend practices and procedures that online platforms should follow in order to meet their new duty-of-care obligation. This will include methods of monitoring and moderating content which, according to digital economy minister Chris Philp, will likely feature a requirement for human inspection – not just automated checks.
- Our response to online harms should focus as much on cure as prevention
- Digital minister: ‘Online anonymity is important’
- Government unveils plans for social media regulator
Under the draft Online Safety Bill, social media companies will have new duties to protect their users from harmful content such as online abuse,” he said, in answer to a written parliamentary question from Scottish National Party MP Kirsten Oswald. “Ofcom, as the independent regulator, will recommend proportionate systems and processes, including for content moderation, that social media companies should put in place to fulfil these duties. We anticipate that Ofcom will recommend a combination of human moderation and other systems, depending on what is effective and proportionate for in-scope services.”
The initial draft of the Online Safety Bill was published by the government in May last year; in December, a parliamentary committee released a report calling for the laws to go even further and include additional offences, such as so-called cyber-flashing, as well as extending in scope to cover the potential harmful impacts of algorithms.
Government will respond to the report and its recommendations in the next few weeks.
Share this page
CONTRIBUTIONS FROM READERS
Please login to post a comment or register for a free account.
Technology services firm has revealed two data-compromising incidents in recent week
Authorities have complained about the lack of time taken to be notified by IT firm and wrongly being told personal data was not put at risk
In the first of a series of exclusive interviews, the head of government’s ‘Digital HQ’ talks to PublicTechnology about the Central Digital and Data Office’s work to unlock £8bn...
The question is not whether a diversity of talent exists, but how do we enable all to move forward in industry, according to Leah Thompson from the University of Oxford
Related Sponsored Articles
The traditional reactive approach to cybersecurity, which involves responding to attacks after they have occurred, is no longer sufficient. Murielle Gonzalez reports on a webinar looking at...