Think tank calls for urgent review of how blockchain could help – and hinder – police

Written by Sam Trendall on 24 September 2017 in News
News

The Police Foundation identifies various potential benefits and challenges of distributed-ledger technology

Blockchain could help law-enforcement agencies share data with each and the public, according to Police Foundation director Rick Muir

Leading think tank The Police Foundation is urging law enforcement and government to examine the ways in which blockchain could help conduct criminal investigations – as well the challenges it could pose.

The organisation’s director Rick Muir has flagged up three major potential benefits of the technology for the police and the wider public sector. The first is that it could permit citizens to have more access to their data and power over how it is used. 

“Crime reports could be made on a distributed ledger, with victims being updated automatically every time there was a development in the case, rather than police officers or prosecutors having to remember to phone the victim,” he said.

Secondly, blockchain could solve some of the problems the police faces around the interoperability of systems and sharing of data between various forces and other parts of the criminal-justice system. 

“Blockchain may help by allowing multiple users access to the same data with varying levels of permission,” Muir said.


Related content


Finally, the Police Foundation chief claims that using blockchain could help deliver efficiencies by helping avoid the information bottlenecks that occur during an investigation when one agency needs to get hold of data from another. 

“In 2010, Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary found that during the prosecution of a standard domestic burglary there were 70 ‘rubbing points’, where the progress of a case was dependent upon one justice agency securing information from another,” he said. “In addition, as part of this process there were at least seven occasions where data needed to be transferred between agencies.”

Muir added: “This level of complexity presents multiple moments for mistakes to be made and for duplication to occur. Blockchain technology could enable automatic updates and design in rules to prevent error.”

But adopting the technology brings with it numerous potential challenges, Muir said, and the police “should not breathlessly embrace blockchain as the solution to all our problems”.

One such challenge is a level of encryption that could allow criminals to protect their identities. Another is that “a more decentralised internet” built around distributed-ledger technologies like blockchain would make it harder to monitor and remove content such as child pornography and blogs and videos inciting or promoting terrorism.

Muir concluded: “The government, the police, the public,” and the tech sector should rapidly discuss the implications [of blockchain].

Blockchain is a public digital ledger in which entries are separate, but linked together by cryptography. It achieved prominence after being used as a key building block of the bitcoin virtual currency.

 

About the author

Sam Trendall is editor of PublicTechnology

Share this page

Tags

Categories

CONTRIBUTIONS FROM READERS

Please login to post a comment or register for a free account.

Comments

Donald Walker M... (not verified)

Submitted on 10 November, 2017 - 16:21
Explanation of what blockchain is mostly missing.

Related Articles

ICO urges Capita customers to ‘check their position’ after 90 organisations report data breaches
31 May 2023

Technology services firm has revealed two data-compromising incidents in recent week

 

MoJ reprimanded by ICO after ‘bags of confidential documents’ exposed for over two weeks
25 May 2023

Sensitive data was left unsecured in prison holding area, according to data watchdog

Rochford District Council pins data breach on Capita’s ‘unsafe storage’
17 May 2023

Authority claims it is taking ‘swift and decisive action’ in response to incident it claims affected several councils

WhatsApp and private email banned for government use at higher security tiers
13 April 2023

Officials are warned that, if they choose to use non-corporate channels, they must 'be prepared to defend your choices'

Related Sponsored Articles

Proactive defence: A new take on cyber security
16 May 2023

The traditional reactive approach to cybersecurity, which involves responding to attacks after they have occurred, is no longer sufficient. Murielle Gonzalez reports on a webinar looking at...