Digital-identity policy function shifted from GDS to DCMS

Written by Sam Trendall on 13 June 2018 in News
News

Move follows the earlier transfer of data policymakers

Responsibility for policymaking in the area of digital identity has been moved from the Government Digital Service to the Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport.

DCMS will not be providing accreditation for individual digital-identity services, nor will it mandate the use of particular products or platforms. 

But it will have a remit to formulate digital-identity policy that boosts citizens’ confidence in the digital economy – covering the provision of services by both public- and private-sector entities. In this work, it will consider the relative merits of existing identity schemes – seemingly including, but not limited to, the GOV.UK Verify tool.

Responsibility for the development and rollout of Verify will remain with GDS.

A digital identity constitutes one or more pieces of information that can be used to confirm that a person, organisation, device, or application is what or whom it claims to be. An identity can rely on the likes of email addresses, passwords, or age-verification methods.


Related content


Digital identities can be used to gain access to online accounts or services. The GDS-developed Verify tool relies on users’ digital identities from the likes of Barclays, Experian, and the Post Office to grant access to a range of government services.

The shift of policymaking responsibility, which is understood to have taken place about six weeks ago without any formal announcement, is the second such move this year. On 1 April, responsibility for data policy, governance, and data-sharing initiatives was migrated from GDS to DCMS. About 15 policymakers moved between the two organisations as part of that rejig.

No further individuals have been ported over to DCMS as part of this move, although a handful of those that came over at the beginning of April will be redeployed to create a new team that will focus on digital-identity policy.

As the department with responsibility for the digital economy, it is understood that the government considers DCMS to be the most suitable home for all digital- and data-related policy. The recent redeployment of responsibilities is designed to promote more joined-up policymaking.

A recent report from think tank Policy Exchange – which featured a foreword from former Cabinet Office minister Francis Maude – called for GDS to be moved wholesale into DCMS. But minister for implementation Oliver Dowden – whose brief includes responsibility for GDS – has said that the digital-delivery unit will remain within the Cabinet Office.

About the author

Sam Trendall is editor of PublicTechnology

Share this page

Tags

Categories

CONTRIBUTIONS FROM READERS

Please login to post a comment or register for a free account.

Related Articles

Related Sponsored Articles

Avoid Infrastructure Paralysis: Six benefits of moving legacy Oracle workloads to the cloud
6 April 2021

There are many reasons to keep your Oracle workloads running on local servers. But there are even more reasons to move them to the cloud as part of a wider digital transition strategy. Six Degrees...

Human Centric Process Management: The common base for digital transformation, cost savings, compliance and agility
11 March 2021

Engage Process explains how to ensure that process remains at the heart of your management programs - and how to keep undue pressure from those processes 

Optimising the Benefits of Hybrid IT
7 April 2021

SolarWinds explains how public sector organisations can make the most of their hybrid IT investments - delivering services that are both innovative and reliable 

The Role of Technology and Real-time Data in Managing Concurrent Emergencies
11 March 2021

With the backdrop of the COVID-19 pandemic, every disaster now entails responding to at least two emergencies. Dataminr explains how organisations can best prepare.