Public ethics body to examine Home Office data use
BFEG asked to provide oversight of department’s use of ‘large and complex data sets’
Credit: Steve Cadman/CC BY-SA 2.0
A public ethics body has been asked to examine possible ethical issues related to the Home Office’s use of “large and complex data sets”.
The Biometrics and Forensics Ethics Group – a non-departmental public body sponsored by the Home Office – is to provide the department with “independent oversight” of its Data Ethics Governance Framework. The aim of assessing the framework, which was created “to ensure balanced consideration of the use of data within the Home Office”, is to boost the public’s confidence in how the department utilises data.
Related content
- Windrush scandal fallout sees Home Office suspend data-sharing activities
- HMRC, Home Office, and DWP to share data in ‘fully digital’ post-Brexit immigration system
- NHS shares patient information with Home Office for immigration enforcement
The BFEG will be examining the use of technologies used to create biometric and forensic identification data, as well as assessing “ethical issues relating to scientific services” provided by the department to police forces and other criminal-justice organisations. The ethics body will also look at how data is used by the Home Office in research and, and how the use of biometric and forensic data is managed.
BFEG chair Chris Hughes said: “With ever-increasing volumes of data and the implementation of new data protection legislation it’s more appropriate than ever to expand the BFEG remit to consider large and complex data sets. The expansion will build on the committee’s existing work and will work to ensure that the use of an individual’s personal data is legitimate and proportionate, contributing to justified trust in the Home Office.”
Share this page
Tags
Categories
CONTRIBUTIONS FROM READERS
Please login to post a comment or register for a free account.
Related Articles
Privacy campaigners have hailed a major victory as a judgement declares the use of general warrants unlawful. PublicTechnology takes a closer look.
PublicTechnology completes our round-up of the most read and significant stories of 2020
PublicTechnology editor Sam Trendall picks out the big issues that might shape the year ahead. Apart from that one.
Ofqual data shows almost 28,000 challenges were made
Related Sponsored Articles
The remote-first world has seen email being relied on more than ever as a core communication mechanism - but with 93% of IT leaders acknowledging a risk to sensitive data, what steps should be...
One Trust breaks down the modular approach of the new SCCs