Public sector given March 2019 deadline to ditch .gsi domains and move to public cloud

Written by Sam Trendall on 9 November 2017 in News
News

Government issues edict instructing public bodies to move email and websites to gov.uk and other new domains

Public-sector bodies still using .gsi email and website addresses have less than 18 months to migrate to newer domains hosted in the public cloud.

Addresses from the gsi family of domains – which include gsi.gov.uk, gcsx.gov.uk, and gsx.gov.uk – are no longer issued by the Government Digital Service. These addresses have been replaced by gov.uk domains, as well as others including gov.scot, llyw.cymru, and gov.wales.

Any public-sector entities still using gsi domains for their organisation’s email communications have been instructed by the government to stop doing so by a deadline of March 2019. Any organisations outside the public sector with gsi email domains must replace them with a non-government alternative within the same timeframe.

The government believes that “the timescale should be achievable for most organisations”. Any bodies that have large or complex requirements that might make timely compliance challenging are asked to contact the Cabinet Office to discuss the matter in more detail.


Related content


Public sector users must move to the newer public cloud-based email domains but “can use hosted or on-premises email services in the short term if you can’t move right away”, the government said.

The government said that email migration should be considered a priority, but the policy and deadline also applies to websites and any other web-based services using gsi domains.

“These domains no longer deliver value for money and our security needs can be delivered in better ways,” said the government. “This policy covers all services that use a gsi-family domain name, but you must prioritise your email. Other technologies that make email secure are now widely available at low cost on the public cloud, and are built into many of the messaging tools that people use every day.”

It added: “For other services, like websites, the first step is to change to your new domain name. You should also consider migrating it from the PSN to the internet.”

The Government Secure Intranet, or GSi, was launched in 1997 to enable public-sector organisations to securely communicate and share data online. The government first indicated its desire to move away from gsi domains back in 2010, when it announced that they would continue to be supported for no more than five years. That deadline may have come and gone, but this week’s policy update marks the first time that a definitive deadline for their retirement has been set.

 

About the author

Sam Trendall is editor of PublicTechnology

Share this page

Tags

Categories

CONTRIBUTIONS FROM READERS

Please login to post a comment or register for a free account.

Related Articles

Report calls for ‘more power’ in Whitehall to be centralised
26 January 2021

UK’s top two civil servants should be handed more responsibility as part of drive to make Cabinet Office more effective, says IfG

Government shakes up digital leadership
12 January 2021

Home Office tech chief Davinson appointed leader of newly created Central Digital and Data Office while Read arrives from MoJ to head up GDS

Major IT firms added to cross-government strategic supplier list
7 January 2021

Computacenter and AWS have, in the last 12 months, both been added to the list of the government’s foremost suppliers

Related Sponsored Articles

Remote working opened the doors to cyberattack and data breach risks – we can close them
8 December 2020

In 2020 public sector organisations have been tested to a degree never experienced before. According to CrowdStrike, increasing cybersecurity attacks are an additional complication they must...

Email security incidents happen every 12 hours – it’s time to close the gap in Microsoft 365
21 January 2021

The remote-first world has seen email being relied on more than ever as a core communication mechanism - but with 93% of IT leaders acknowledging a risk to sensitive data, what steps should be...